Simultaneous determination of Propranolol
hydrochloride and Hydrochlorothiazide in Tablets formulation using
spectrophotometric technique (Simultaneous Equation Method)
Bhadresh V. Savaj1, Ashutosh Kumar Patidar2,
Hashumati A. Raj3
1Department
of Quality Assurance, Shree Dhanvantry Pharmacy College,
Kim, Surat.
2Department
of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Shree Dhanvantry
Pharmacy College, Kim, Surat.
*Corresponding Author E-mail:
ABSTRACT:
A new
spectrophotometric method was developed for simultaneous determination of
compounds with interfering spectra in binary mixtures without previous
separation, showing significant advantages over the conventional methods regarding
minimal data manipulation and applicability. The proposed method was applied
for the determination of Propranolol hydrochloride and Hydrochlorothiazide in
Tablets formulation, for determination of sampling wavelength, 10 μg/mlof each of PRO and HCT
were scanned in 200-400 nm range and sampling wavelengths were 289 nm for PRO
and 270 nm for HCT are selected for development and validation of simultaneous
equation method. For this method linearity observed in the range of 10-50 μg/ml for PRP and 5-25 μg/ml
for HCT, and in their pharmaceutical formulation with mean percentage
recoveries100.13± 0.86 and 100.07± 0.58, respectively. The method was validated
according to ICH guidelines and can be applied for routine quality control
testing.
KEYWORDS: Spectroscopic
method, simultaneous equation method, propranolol
hydrochloride and hydrochlorothiazide.
1. INTRODUCTION:
Many methods have been introduced for the
analysis of binary mixtures among which the spectrophotometric based methods
were the most simple, fast and applicable in almost all laboratories. Several
manipulations were performed on the raw overlapping spectral data to enable
mixture resolution for example, using different order derivatives [1-11].The
aim of the present work was to develop a new simple, rapid, selective method
for the simultaneous determination of components having overlapping spectra in
binary mixtures, having the advantages of minimal data processing and a wider
range of applications over the previously mentioned methods. To prove the
ability of the newly described method in resolving the overlapping spectral
data and simultaneous determination of each component, it was applied for the
analysis of a mixture of propranolol hydrochloride
(PRO) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) formulated together in the form of tablets
widely used for the treatment of heart related problems accompanying several
hypertension.
Propranolol hydrochloride is chemically (2
RS)-1-[(1- methyl ethyl) amino]-3-(naphthalene-l-
yloxy)propan-2-ol hydrochloride[12]. Propranolol
hydrochloride isa beta-adrenergic blocking agent that
is used for treating high blood pressure, heart pain, abnormal
rhythms of the heart, and some neurologic conditions, also used to Angina
pectoris and coronary artery disease. Propranolol is useful in slowing and
regulating Tachycardia[13]. Hydrochlorothiazide is chemically
6-chloro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,2,4-benzothiadiazine-7-sulphonamide-1,1-dioxide[14]. Hydrochlorothiazide is Diuretic and Antihypertensive used to treat
excessive fluid accumulation and swelling (edema) of the body caused
by heart failure, cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, corticosteroid
medications, and nephrotic syndrome. Combination of propranolol hydrochloride and hydrochlorothiazide is used
to treat hypertension and heart related dieses[15].
Fig.1 (A) is Structure of propranolol
hydrochloride and (B) is structure of Hydrochlorothiazide.
1.1.
Theory
We can find out concentration of both the
drug from combination mixture using the simultaneous equation method. In this
method using the absorbance of both the drug and mixture at their wavelength
and put this value in following equation and we can find out the concentration
of drugs present in combination.
Cx =
(A2 × Ay1) – (A1 × Ay2)
---------------------------------
------- (1)
(Ay1 × Ax2)
– (Ay2 × Ax1)
Cy = (A1 × Ax2)
– (A2 × Ax1)
--------------------------------- ------- (2)
(Ax2 × Ay1) – (Ax1 × Ay2)
Where,
Cx = Concentration of drug X
Cy
= Concentration of drug
A1 = Absorbanceof
mixture at wavelength 1
A2
= Absorbance of mixture at
wavelength 2
Ax1
= Absorptivity of drug A at wavelength 1
Ax2
= Absorptivity of drug A at wavelength 2
Ay1
= Absorptivity of drug B at wavelength 1
Ay2
=Absorptivity of drug B at wavelength 2
2. MATERIAL AND METHOD:
2.1. Apparatus
A double beam
UV/Visible spectrophotometer
(Shimadzu
model 2450, Japan) with spectral
width of 2nm, 1 cm quartz cells
was used to measure absorbance
of all the solutions. Spectra
were automatically
obtained by UV-Probe system software.
2.2. Reference samples
PRO and HCT reference standard
are kindly supply by Cipla LTD, Mumbai and CTX Life
Science, Surat as a gift sample respectively.
2.3. Pharmaceutical formulation
Cipler-H tablet, labelled
to contain 40 mg PRO and 20 mg HCT, manufactured by Cipla
Ltd.
2.4. Materials and reagents
Methanol AR grade(RANKEM)
2.5. Standard solutions
Accurately
weighed quantity
of
PRO10mg was
transferred
to 100ml volumetric flask,
dissolved and diluted
up to mark with Methanol to give a stock solution
having
strength 100µg/ml.
Accurately
weighed
quantity of HCT
10mg was transferred into
100ml volumetric flask, dissolved and diluted up to mark with Methanol to give
a stock solution having
strength 100µg/ml.
Pipette out accurately 1 ml of
PRO stock solution (100µg/ml), 0.5 ml of HCT stock solution (100µg/ml)
in 10 ml volumetric flask and make up the volume up to the mark with Methanol.
It gives solution containing PRO 10µg/ml, HCT 0.5µg/ml.
Dissolve
tablet sample in 100 ml volumetric flask containing 100 ml methanol. Take 1 ml
tablet sample solution in 10 ml volumetric flask and make up volume up to mark
with methanol.
2.6. Procedures
2.6.1. Construction of
calibration curves (linearity)
This
series consisted of five concentrations of standard PRO solution ranging from
10-50μg/ml. The solutions were prepared by
pipetting
out standard PRO stock solution (1ml,
2ml, 3ml, 4ml, 5ml)
was transferred
into a series of 10ml volumetric flasks
and volume was adjusted up to mark with Methanol. A zero order spectra
of the resulting solutions were recorded,
measured
the absorbance at
289.0nm against are agent
blank
solution(Methanol). Calibration curve
was
prepared by
plotting absorbance versus respective
concentration of PRO.
Fig. 2 Overlain linear zero
order spectra
of PRO (Red) and HCT (Black) in 2:1 ratio
Fig. 3
calibration curve of propranolol hydrochloride
Fig. 4
calibration curve of hydrochlorothiazide
This
series consisted of five concentrations
of standard HCT solution ranging
from 5-25 μg/ml.
The solutions were prepared
by pipetting out Standard HCT stock
solution (0.5ml, 12ml, 1.5ml,
2ml and 2.5ml) was transferred into
a series of 10ml volumetric
flasks and volume was adjusted
up to mark with Methanol. A zero
order
spectra of the resulting
solutions were recorded and
measured
the absorbance at
270 nm against a reagent
blank
solution (Methanol). Calibration curve
was
prepared by
plotting absorbance versus respective
concentration of HCT.
2.6.2. Analysis of
laboratory-prepared mixtures.
Laboratory-prepared
mixtures containing different ratios of PRO and HCT were prepared. By applying
the procedure under linearity, absorbance at 289.0 nm was recorded for PRO and
270.0 nm were recorded for HCT. The concentration of each drug in each mixture
was calculated from its corresponding Cx and Cy
equation. Validity of the method was assessed by spiking the pharmaceutical
formulation by known amounts of standard drug powders (standard addition
technique). The recovery of the added standards was then calculated after
applying the proposed method.
2.6.3. Application of the
proposed method for the simultaneous determination of PRO and HCT in Cipler – H tablet
Take
one tablet and dissolved into a 100-ml beaker and sonicated
in 100 ml methanol for 15 min, filtered into 100- ml volumetric flask. The
residue was washed three times each using 10 ml methanol and completed to the
mark with the same solvent. Transfer accurately 1 ml of the extracted solution
into a 10-ml measuring flask. One millilitres of PRO
working solution (20 µg/ml) equivalent to 40 µg PRO was added and completed to
the mark with methanol. The general procedure under linearity was followed.
3. RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION:
The absorbance wavelength for
PRO and HCT found to be 289 and 270 nm, respectively, which is different and
hence non-overlapping. Thus simultaneous determination of PRO and HCT in bulk
mixture-I and tablet solution-I was found to be successful by simultaneous
equation.
3.1. Specificity
The specificity of the method
was investigated by observing any interference of one drug with other two drugs
in bulk mixture and tablet solution. Similarly the interference of excipients of tablet with drugs was investigated.
3.2. Linearity and range
The linearity of method is its
ability within a given range to obtain test results which are directly or
through a mathematical transformation, proportional to the concentration of analyte. Linearity of the method was determined at five
concentration levels for PRO and HCT independently.
3.3. Accuracy
The accuracy of an analytical
method is the closeness of the test results to the true value. It was tested by
spiking standard PRO solution in different concentration 80, 100 and 120% to a
tablet solution. The tablet solution was analyzed at 289 nm for estimation of
PRO. Similarly, the accuracy for HCT was determined at 270 nm, respectively.
3.4. Precision
The intra-day precision
(repeatability) of method was determined by measuring the absorbance of tablet
solution-I at 289 and 270 nm for PRO and HCT, respectively. Within a laboratory
over a short period of time. The inter-day precision (intermediate precision)
was determined by measuring the absorbance of tablet solution-I at 289 and 270
nm for PRO and HCT, respectively. Within a laboratory on three consecutive
days, by different analysts. The %RSD was calculated for intra and inter-day
precision.
3.5. LOD and LOQ
The LOD of an analytical method
is the lowest amount of analyte in a sample which can
be detected but not necessarily quantified. The detection limit (DL) of method
was determined by equation, DL = (3.3 σ)/S, where, σ– standard
deviation of blank response, S– slope of the calibration curve. The quantitation limit (QL) of analyte
was determined by equation DL = (10 σ)/S, where, σ– standard
deviation of blank response, S– slope of the calibration curve
3.6. Robustness and ruggedness
Robustness and ruggedness of the
method has been evaluated at two different levels i.e. change in stock solution
and changing the instrument.
4. Analysis of commercial tablets
The proposed method was
successfully applied to the analysis of both mixtures in their pharmaceutical
preparations. Results obtained were precise and in good agreement with the labelled claim as concluded from the satisfactory values of
% recovery and RSD(%) gathered in table 2 and 3. Proposed method is precise and
accurate, and give same result in same day and between the day and this data is
gathered in table 1. When we change in standard stock concentration or changed
the instrument that time also this proposed method give good result this data
also gathered in table 4 and 5.
Table 1: Inter day and intraday precision data for propranolol and hydrochlorothiazide in three different
concentration ranges.
|
Analyte |
Nominal Value
(µg/Ml) |
Within Day |
Between Day |
||
|
Found ±
SD(µg/Ml) |
%RSD |
Found ±
SD(µg/Ml) |
%RSD |
||
|
PRO |
10 |
9.82 ± 0.01 |
0.1133 |
10.24 ± 0.0662 |
0.6465 |
|
20 |
19.32 ± 0.07 |
0.4041 |
20.29 ± 0.0724 |
0.3569 |
|
|
30 |
29.58 ± 0.087 |
0.3156 |
30.54 ±
0.0566 |
0.1746 |
|
|
HCT |
5 |
4.96 ± 0.04 |
0.8064 |
5.15 ± 0.04836 |
0.9106 |
|
10 |
9.9690 ± 0.049 |
0.51 |
10.12 ± 0.006 |
0.0680 |
|
|
15 |
15.09 ± 0.082 |
0.5463 |
15.42 ± 0.058 |
0.3558 |
|
Table 2: Accuracy data for propranolol
hydrochloride with % recovery and % RSD
|
Concentration of
PRO from formulation (µg/ml) |
Amount of PRO
spiked (µg/ml) |
Total amount
(µg/ml) |
Amount found
(µg/ml) |
% recovery |
S.D |
% RSD |
|
40 |
8 |
48 |
48.2234 |
100.464 |
0.001 |
0.000955 |
|
40 |
10 |
50 |
50.9428 |
98.15 |
0.00577 |
0.000567 |
|
40 |
12 |
52 |
51.1872 |
101.16 |
0.00095 |
0.009885 |
Table 3: Accuracy data for hydrochlorothiazide with % recovery and
% RSD
|
Concentration of
HCT from formulation (µg/ml) |
Amount of HCT
spiked (µg/ml) |
Total amount
(µg/ml) |
Amount found
(µg/ml) |
% recovery |
S.D |
% RSD |
|
20 |
4 |
24 |
25.223 |
100.892 |
0.005292 |
0.005245 |
|
20 |
5 |
25 |
24.5388 |
98.1552 |
0.00500 |
0.005095 |
|
20 |
6 |
26 |
26.3041 |
101.17 |
0.00095 |
0.009885 |
Table 4: Robustness and ruggedness data into that change in stock
concentration in that concentration of stock – 1 is 100 µg/ml and concentration
of stock – 2 is 500 µg/ml.
|
PRO (Stock 100 µg/ml
) |
HCT (Stock 100 µg/ml
) |
PRO (Stock 500 µg/ml
) |
HCT (Stock 500 µg/ml
) |
||||
|
Abs ± S.D |
% RSD |
Abs ± S.D |
% RSD |
Abs ± S.D |
% RSD |
Abs ± S.D |
% RSD |
|
0.484 ± 0.0020 |
0.4295 |
0.875 ± 0.0017 |
0.1979 |
0.4953 ± 0.001525 |
0.3083 |
0.776 ± 0.00173 |
0.2234 |
|
0.988 ± 0.002 |
0.20240 |
1.804 ± 0.0015 |
0.0846 |
0.9066 ± 0.002082 |
0.2295 |
1.605 ± 0.00202 |
0.1296 |
|
1.285 ± 0.00202 |
0.1619 |
2.358 ± 0.0017 |
0.0734 |
1.414 ± 0.0015 |
0.1079 |
2.950 ± 0.02569 |
0.8709 |
Table 5: Robustness and ruggedness data into that change in
instrument used, in that instrument 1 and 2 are used.
|
PRO (Instrument
- 1 ) |
HCT (Instrument
- 1 ) |
PRO (Instrument
- 2 ) |
HCT (Instrument
- 2 ) |
||||
|
Abs ± S.D |
% RSD |
Abs ± S.D |
% RSD |
Abs ± S.D |
% RSD |
Abs ± S.D |
% RSD |
|
0.484 ± 0.0020 |
0.4295 |
0.875 ± 0.0017 |
0.1979 |
0.585 ± 0.0015 |
0.26096 |
0.864 ± 0.0020 |
0.2408 |
|
0.988 ± 0.002 |
0.20240 |
1.804 ± 0.0015 |
0.0846 |
0.9866 ± 0.00208 |
0.21098 |
1.61 ± 0.010 |
0.6211 |
|
1.285 ± 0.00202 |
0.1619 |
2.358 ± 0.0017 |
0.0734 |
1.6163 ± 0.001528 |
0.09450 |
2.415 ± 0.001 |
0.04140 |
Table 6: Result of all validation and development parameters for
this proposed method for propranolol and
hydrochlorothiazide.
|
Sr. No |
Parameter |
Propranolol |
Hydrochlorothiazide |
|
1 |
Range (µg/ml) |
10-50 |
5-25 |
|
2 |
Correlation coefficient (r2) |
0.9951 |
0.9971 |
|
3 |
Regression equation |
y =
0.0152x + 0.2829 |
y =
0.0688x - 0.002 |
|
4 |
Inter day precision |
0.1133-0.4041 |
0.51-8064 |
|
5 |
Intraday precision |
0.17468-0.64653 |
0.068-0.91069 |
|
6 |
Accuracy (%recovery ± SD) |
100.2624 ± 0.00486 |
100.0697
± 0.006764 |
|
7 |
LOD (µg/ml) |
0.090 |
0.050 |
|
8 |
LOQ (µg/ml) |
0.0089 |
0.0036 |
|
9 |
Robustness and ruggedness |
0.10798 - 0.30838 |
0.03824 – 0.5848 |
5. CONCLUSION:
A novel, simple, rapid and
sensitive method is proposed for the analysis of two binary mixtures with
overlapping spectra. The method involves the generation of absorbance spectra
followed by measurement of the absorbance. The proposed method does not require
any sophisticated mathematical treatment for the absorption data, and it
exhibits several advantages over other spectrophotometric methods for
resolution of binary mixtures. The applicability of the developed method was evaluated
through the determination of both drug combinations in several
laboratory-prepared mixtures and in pharmaceutical tablets with good accuracy
and precision. Therefore, the presented methodology is adequate for the routine
quality control analysis of these fixed-dose combinations.
6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The
authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.
7. REFERENCES:
1 S. Altinos, D.J. Tekeli.
Analysis of glimepiride by using derivative UV
spectrophotometric method, Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 2011, 24: 507.
2 J. Chaudhary,
A. Jain, V. Saini, Analytical Method Development and
Validation for the Simultaneous estimation of Alprazolam
and Propranolol in their combined dosage form. Int. J. Drug Delivery, 2012, 4:
310-315.
3 S.
J. Daharwal, Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous
Estimation of Diazepam and Propranolol in Bulk Drug and Its Formulations. Asian
J. Pharm. Ana., 2013, 3: 20-23.
4 M. Suman, N.C. Rao, S. K. Kumar, P. Venkateswarlu,
Development of Simple Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of
Propranolol using p-Chloranilic acid in Bulk and
Dosage forms. Res. J. Pharm. Bio. Chem. Sci., 2013, 4: 342-346.
5 N.A. Shivarkar, P.B. Dudhe, M.A. Nagras, K.S. Jain, Simultaneous Estimation of Flunarizine dihydrochloride and
Propranolol hydrochloride in Bulk Drug and Capsule. Int. J. Chem
Tech Res., 2012, 4: 1007-1012.
6 K.S.
Rao, M. Panda, N. Keshar,
Spectrophotometric methods for the simultaneous estimation of losartan potassium and hydrochlorothiazide in tablet dosage
forms. Chronicles of Young Scientists, 2011, 2:155-159.
7 N.S. Abdelwahab,
Spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of Carvedilol and Hydrochlorothiazide in combined dosage form.
Arabian J. Chem., 2011,(in press)
8 M.C.F. Ferraro, P.M. Castellano,
T.S. Kaufman, Simultaneous determination of amiloride
hydrochloride and hydrochlorothiazide in synthetic samples and pharmaceutical Formulations
by multivariate analysis of spectrophotometric data. J. Pharm. Biomed.
Anal.,2002, 30: 1121-1131.
9 T.S. Belala,
N. Hoda, G. Daabeesb, M.A. Khalekb, M.S. Mahrousb, M.M. Khamis, New simple spectrophotometric method for
determination of the binary mixtures (atorvastatin
calcium and ezetimibe; candesartan
cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide) in tablets. J.
Pharm. Anal., 2013, 3:118–126.
10 N.M.
Bhatia, R.B. Desai, S.D. Jadhav, Simultaneous estimation
of losartan potassium and hydrochlorothiazide from
tablets by first order derivative spectroscopy. Int. J. Pharm Pharm. Sci., 2013, 5: 231-235.
11 V.R. Galande,
K.G. Baheti, S. Indraksha,
M. H. Dehghan, Estimation of Amlodipine Besylate,
Valsartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in Bulk Mixture and
Tablet by UV Spectrophotometry. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 2012,74: 18-23.
12 Indian Pharmacopoeia, the Indian
Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad, Govt. of India Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, 2010, vol. III, 1987.
13 K.D. Tripathi,
Essentials of Medical Pharmacology, Sixed Ed., Jaypee
Brother’s Medical Publishers (P) LTD, St Louis, 2008.
14 Indian Pharmacopoeia, the Indian
Pharmacopoeia Commission, Ghaziabad, Govt. of India Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, 2010, vol. II, 1451.
15 H. Lüllmann, L.
Hein, K. Mohr D. Bieger, Color Atlas of
Pharmacology, Third Ed., Thieme Stuttgart Publication, 2005.
Received on 25.02.2015 Accepted on 18.03.2015
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 5(1): Jan.- March 2014; Page 36-40
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5675.2015.00007.1